He was banned for not being nice. When the discussion of banning him came up, he started accusing us of not being nice for banning him. Has anyone noticed how well mannered he is acting over on talk?
He was banned for not being nice. When the discussion of banning him came up, he started accusing us of not being nice for banning him. Has anyone noticed how well mannered he is acting over on talk?
Rest assured, we have a backup of Farrar's car blog and it will be restored in the near future. (Steve Rice - March 2016)
Rest assured, we have a backup of Shep's posts and all of them will be restored in the near future. (Steve Rice - March 2017)
It's clear that his intent was never to be a part of the Today community, but rather to see what it would take to push Steve over the edge, for the sole purpose of being able to call him a hypocrite on the promotion of this site as an uncensored forum.
In other words, he just wanted to be a jerk plain and simple!
While he professed that the 'be nice' rule was wholly subjective, I actually proved him wrong using objective evidence. He didn't accept that though and claimed that others were also violating that rule, but came up short with objective empirical evidence, as anyone can see for themselves in that thread here in his corner.
"You can never use too much anti-seize!"
--Josh S.
#1798